A Growing Problem with No Easy Answers
In 2025, anesthesia subsidies are projected to rise by 16%.
As provider costs go up and reimbursements tighten, traditional FMV approaches aren’t working.
Each side usually hires its own consultant—leading to mistrust, long delays, and higher costs.
Presenting: The Bi-Lateral Anesthesia Arbitration Evaluation
Neutral Third-Party Review
Neutral Third-Party Review
Neutral Third-Party Review
Evaluation is led by an independent expert — no one controls the outcome.
Shared Cost Model
Neutral Third-Party Review
Neutral Third-Party Review
The hospital and anesthesia group split the cost equally to ensure fairness.
Thorough Financial Analysis
Neutral Third-Party Review
Thorough Financial Analysis
We consider staffing levels, payer mix, call burden, and compensation trends.
Fair Review Period
Trusted, Final Recommendation
Thorough Financial Analysis
Each side has the opportunity to provide additional data or challenge findings.
Support for Both Sides
Trusted, Final Recommendation
Trusted, Final Recommendation
Both groups receive expert guidance to understand results and move forward.
Trusted, Final Recommendation
Trusted, Final Recommendation
Trusted, Final Recommendation
We deliver a balanced outcome based on facts — not opinions.